I’ve always taken a little offense to the term “not-for-profit”. I like aspirational and empowering terms and being described as NOT something implies being less than or second rate. Maybe it’s somehow related to some people having lower expectations of these organizations (but that’s a whole other discussion). I’ve toyed with terms like the “independent sector” or the “third sector” but they seem a bit awkward and take too much time to explain their meaning. Last week a friend gave me a new term that I really like. His point is that some corporations are “For Profit” while others forego the profit to be “For Impact”. I understand that we can’t easily change the Ohio Revised Code or IRS regulations so we’re going to be stuck with tax-exempt not-for-profit for a long time. But I feel a certain comfort and challenge in working for an organization that is for impact.
Back to PeopleWhoCare
Local or Regional Interest
On Philanthropy
Useful Info
Archives
- February 2011
- January 2011
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Blog Stats
- 2,806 hits
0 Responses to “Being NOT Something”